Queer Bookworm
-
have a Destiel-Speedpaint because I can’t sleep
Dean: fuck you Naomi, fuck you God, fuck destiny, fuck everything, Cas is mine
-
Somehow I think saying something rude about my friend won’t make me like you
-
Anonymous asked: if you're aware that iphones are "horrifically bourgeois" then why would you by one? there is like 50 other phones to choose from.
because i don’t give two shits about customizing my phone or any of that pointless shit they use to sell you other phones with. i just want a phone...
-
one spn lady per episode » like a virgin
✿ eve -
I’m sorry I can’t participate in societies’ bullshit because of my severe gender blindness
My english teacher is a fan of Sherlock
She also knows that I am a fan of Sherlock
She told me I couldn’t put Benedict in my presentation
However,
She will never know.
(via emikafett)
elementalock au: “excuse you?”
It’s going to be a long, painful journey to get them reunited with their partners again.
(via noonturnsmidnight)
a sherlock au where two unlikely bakers share a flat on 221 detective street
is this gonna turn into a sweeney todd type thing or…
(via jokerchenisdifferent)
Let’s get one thing clear at the outset: I am a Nu!Whovian. I will be honest and admit that I’ve seen only bits and pieces of the classic series, and that is something that I would like to watch in the future. Still, the reboot was my introduction to the series; I started with Nine during Spring Break four years ago, and I’ve been hooked ever since. It’s not a series without flaws—indeed, that’s about as far away from the truth as it can be—but it’s a good series and an important one. Through the eyes of an alien come again and again to Earth, we as an audience, however consciously, are called to examine what it is that makes us good and what makes us human. We laugh, we cry, we ship frantically and passionately. A show that can elicit that kind of response has to be good for something, at least.
However, I can also argue that while good responses are evoked by this show, there are also a lot of troubling issues that are brought up as well. I think we see this most prevalently in the Moffat-verse. This isn’t to say that RTD doesn’t have his share of problems (Christ metaphor, anyone? Rather, anyone who DIDN’T catch onto that? Too subtle, RTD!), but for me, the Moffat-verse is the most problematic, mostly in terms of how Moffat himself deals with women and female characters.
This extends into the other works of his that I’ve seen, namely Sherlock and Coupling. I can’t make the blanket statement and say that all of his works raise this issue because I simply haven’t seen all of it, but from his more popular shows, I feel that his treatment of women is at best troubling and at the worst, downright misogynist.
So you can tl;dr this, call me a crazy feminist, and tell me I’m reading too much into this—and honestly, you may be right. Still, this is an issue I have to take into consideration when I watch Who now, when I sit there and frantically wait for Sherlock to start, and so, this results.
[spoilers for New!Who and Sherlock beneath the cut, as well as spoilers for the first two seasons of Coupling]
Aside from the fact that John looks like he is trying to do the worm in the second image, has any one else noticed there are chalk lines (like a track) for the cyclist to follow :)?
HOLY SHIT. A CLUE.
SHERLOCKIANS, ASSEMBLE!
(via rayshippouuchiha)
So we had to call the apartment repair guys
They came
To our
Apartment.
oh god
(via beahbeah)
can we talk about this ~deduction~ sherlock makes in ASiP because it really pisses me off on so many levels and people in the Sally Donovan tag are being fucking pricks so I would like to indulge myself in a little fandom rant
content warning: sexually inappropriate comments at work, sex/slut shaming, misogyny in general, cissexism, racism
(via archetypalboner)
I deduce there is nothing under my microscope
very observant
I laughed way too hard at this.
New headcanon - Looking into the microscope is Sherlock’s equivalent of a kid putting their fingers in their ears and going “la la la I can’t hear you”
So whenever John nags him about leaving heads in the fridge or toes in the sink or something, he goes and “looks busy” on the microscope, even if there’s nothing there.
John’s totally aware of what he’s doing, but he finds it too amusing and endearing to call Sherlock out on it.
Good god the slide he has laying around on the table isn’t even designed to be used with that kind of microscope. You don’t use glass slides with dissecting microscopes as far as I know
(via fuchsimeon)
So, I’ve heard a lot of people say, “Oh, Sherlock doesn’t do this in canon, oh, that’s not right” except, funnily enough, he does. I don’t know what you guys have been taking as canon, and GOD HELP YOU if it’s BBC Sherlock because you’ll see a gigantic difference one chapter into “A Study in Scarlet”. John’s all but an invalid who “object[s] to rows because [his] nerves are shaken” and Sherlock is so damn enthusiastic to meet him that he’s practically a puppy.
So here’s the thing, get your canon straight. Click the link above to go to every single piece of Sherlock canon, since it’s long been part of public domain, and read before you criticize.
(via noonturnsmidnight)
So, I was watching a Sherlock fanvid, and I found this in the comments
^that gif has never been more true than this exact moment. Because that is my face right now. RIP.
(via bomb4st1cb1rd13)
- When they cite Rose, Martha and Donna as proof of his brilliance.
- When they cite River as proof of his brilliance. (Further reasoning- she may be badass but everything she has ever done was centered around the Doctor and NOTHING ELSE.)
- Actually, when they think that a female being able to kick ass makes them a good character. Because, guess what? It doesn’t. When Clara, Amy, and River are being used to sex-up ass-kickery and yet live their entire lives centered around dudes, that’s not being a strong character, that’s him writing his dream girl. And if it was once, it would be okay. But he literally writes the same girl over and over again.
He got lucky with Sally Sparrow.- IRENE ADLER DOESN’T FUCKING COUNT BECAUSE HE DIDN’T COME UP WITH HER CHARACTER AND ALSO MADE HER LESS BAD ASS THAN THE SOURCE MATERIAL, SO SUCK MY NON-EXISTENT DICK.
MORE bracelock thiscrazylittlebrainofmine wanted rebloggable
The scarf is a legit character trait
(via fyeahsherlockandjohn)
